Development Intent
AtlasBrentCouncillorsJumbo_chan
Planning AtlasBrentJumbo Chan
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Harlesden & Kensal Green, Brent

Jumbo Chan.

A Labour member representing Harlesden & Kensal Green in Brent. 0% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Harlesden & Kensal Green itself.

LabourHarlesden & Kensal Green ward
Brent · Jumbo Chan's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
13
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
0%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Amenity space
2
Parking
2
Neighbour impact
2
Accessibility
1
Trees
1
Disabled access
1
Landscaping
1
Commercial
1
Subscribe to see what Jumbo Chan raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Ward objection
3

How Jumbo Chan acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Jumbo Chan moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2021-06-16
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2021-06-16
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2023-10-18
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2021-06-16
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2021-06-16
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2023-10-18
At a glance
PartyLabour
WardHarlesden & Kensal Green
Planning committeeNo
CouncilBrent
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Brent planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 6 of their 13 interventions (46%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.