Development Intent
AtlasBrentCouncillorsThomas_christopher_stephens
Planning AtlasBrentThomas Christopher Stephens
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Brent

Thomas Christopher Stephens.

A Labour member in Brent.

Labour
Brent · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
10
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Amenity space
7
Parking
6
Highways
3
Procedural
3
Privacy
2
Affordable housing
2
Consultation
2
Traffic
2
Subscribe to see what Thomas Christopher Stephens raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Ward objection
6
Raised concern
2
Objected
1

How Thomas Christopher Stephens acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Thomas Christopher Stephens moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Raised concern
Planning Committee
2020-06-10
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2020-06-10
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2020-06-10
Planning Committee
2020-06-10
Planning Committee
2020-06-10
Planning Committee
2019-03-12
Planning Committee
2019-03-12
Planning Committee
2020-06-10
Planning Committee
2020-05-06
Raised concern
Planning Committee
2020-06-10
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2020-06-10
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2020-06-10
Show all 9 rows
Planning Committee
2020-06-10
Planning Committee
2020-06-10
Planning Committee
2019-03-12
Planning Committee
2019-03-12
Planning Committee
2020-06-10
Planning Committee
2020-05-06
At a glance
PartyLabour
Planning committeeNo
CouncilBrent
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Brent planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 0 of their 10 interventions (0%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.