Development Intent
AtlasCamdenCouncillorsAndrew_parkinson
Planning AtlasCamdenAndrew Parkinson
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Planning committee member · Frognal, Camden

Andrew Parkinson.

A Conservative member representing Frognal in Camden. Sits on the planning committee, with 155 recorded interventions.

ConservativeFrognal wardPlanning committee
Camden · Andrew Parkinson's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
155
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Procedural
23
Flooding
4
Heritage
4
Conservation
2
Subscribe to see what Andrew Parkinson raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Declared interest
47
Moved refusal
4

How Andrew Parkinson acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Andrew Parkinson moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Moved refusal
Planning Committee
2022-12-15
Moved refusal
Planning Committee
2022-12-15
Moved refusal
Planning Committee
2022-12-15
Planning Committee
2022-12-15
Moved refusal
Planning Committee
2022-12-15
Moved refusal
Planning Committee
2022-12-15
Moved refusal
Planning Committee
2022-12-15
Show all 4 rows
Planning Committee
2022-12-15
At a glance
PartyConservative
WardFrognal
Planning committeeMember
CouncilCamden
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Camden planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 4 of their 11 interventions (36%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.