Development Intent
AtlasCroydonCouncillorsRobert_canning
Planning AtlasCroydonRobert Canning
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Croydon

Robert Canning.

A Labour member in Croydon.

Labour
Croydon · Robert Canning's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
14
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Construction
4
Highways
3
Neighbour impact
3
Affordable housing
3
Height
2
Density
2
Design
2
Character
2
Subscribe to see what Robert Canning raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Ward objection
4
Ward support
4

How Robert Canning acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Robert Canning moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2019-12-05
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2020-07-30
Ward support
Planning Committee
2020-10-08
Planning Committee
2019-12-05
Planning Committee
2019-05-09
Planning Committee
2019-05-09
Planning Committee
2019-12-05
Planning Committee
2020-10-08
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2019-12-05
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2020-07-30
Ward support
Planning Committee
2020-10-08
Show all 8 rows
Planning Committee
2019-12-05
Planning Committee
2019-05-09
Planning Committee
2019-05-09
Planning Committee
2019-12-05
Planning Committee
2020-10-08
At a glance
PartyLabour
Planning committeeNo
CouncilCroydon
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Croydon planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 2 of their 14 interventions (14%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.