Development Intent
AtlasEnfieldWardsWhitewebbs
Planning AtlasEnfieldWhitewebbs
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Ward · London Borough of Enfield

Whitewebbs.

Whitewebbs sees an approval rate of 72%1 points below the Enfield average across 328 substantive planning decisions, with a refusal rate of 27.8%.[1]

Enfield328 applicationsSave
Whitewebbs · Enfield
Loading map…
328
Applications 2020–26
Decided applications
72%
Approval rate
1pp below borough avg (73%)
27.8%
Refusal rate
15th highest of 32
8.7
Avg decision time
Wks · borough avg 9.2
Data from publicly available Enfield planning records and committee minutes, 2020–26.
Ward overview

Whitewebbs recorded 328 substantive planning decisions over 2020–26, approving 72% of them — 1 percentage points below the Enfield borough average of 73%. Its refusal rate of 27.8% is 15th highest of 32.

Application and refusal breakdown— subscriber data
Residential extension / alteration
New residential
Change of use
Commercial development
Recent planning decisions— subscriber data
Reference
Address
Type
Outcome
Date
Committee members for this ward
Councillor
Party
Role
Interventions
Success rate
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%

Interventions: formal calls to bring an application before committee. Success rate: percentage where the committee sided with the councillor against officer recommendation.

At a glance[1]
WardWhitewebbs
CouncilEnfield
Applications328 (2020–26)
Approval rate72%
Refusal rate27.8%
Decision time8.7 wks avg
Ward members2 (both Labour)
Planning constraints[2]
Conservation areas2
Article 4 directions2
Listed buildings17
TPO trees43
Flood zoneZone 1 (low)
Sources & method
  1. [1]Ward approval and refusal rates, application counts and decision-time figures — London Borough of Enfield planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Conservation areas, Article 4 directions and heritage designations — the borough’s adopted Local Plan and conservation-area appraisals.
  3. [3]Committee interventions and councillor records — public planning committee minutes and published decision notices.
  4. [4]Application-type mix and refusal grounds — case-officer reports coded against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.