Development Intent
AtlasGreenwichCouncillorsAsli_mohammed
Planning AtlasGreenwichAsli Mohammed
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Planning committee member · Woolwich Dockyard, Greenwich

Asli Mohammed.

A Labour member representing Woolwich Dockyard in Greenwich. Sits on the planning committee, with 67 recorded interventions. 3% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Woolwich Dockyard itself.

LabourWoolwich Dockyard wardPlanning committee
Greenwich · Asli Mohammed's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
67
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
3%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Procedural
4
Subscribe to see what Asli Mohammed raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Seconded
4

How Asli Mohammed acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Asli Mohammed moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Seconded
Local Planning Committee
2025-02-25
Seconded
Local Planning Committee
2025-02-25
Seconded
Local Planning Committee
2025-02-25
Local Planning Committee
2025-02-25
Seconded
Local Planning Committee
2025-02-25
Seconded
Local Planning Committee
2025-02-25
Seconded
Local Planning Committee
2025-02-25
Show all 4 rows
Local Planning Committee
2025-02-25
At a glance
PartyLabour
WardWoolwich Dockyard
Planning committeeMember
CouncilGreenwich
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Greenwich planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 62 of their 67 interventions (93%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.