Development Intent
AtlasHaringeyWardsCrouch End
Planning Atlas›Haringey›Crouch End
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Ward · London Borough of Haringey

Crouch End.

Crouch End sees an approval rate of 91% — 4 points above the Haringey average across 1,101 substantive planning decisions, with a refusal rate of 8.7%.[1]

Haringey1,101 applicationsSave
Crouch End · Haringey
Loading map…
1,101
Applications 2020–26
Decided applications
91%
Approval rate
4pp above borough avg (87%)
8.7%
Refusal rate
Lowest in Haringey
8.7
Avg decision time
Wks · borough avg 9.2
Data from publicly available Haringey planning records and committee minutes, 2020–26.
Ward overview

Crouch End recorded 1,101 substantive planning decisions over 2020–26, approving 91% of them — 4 percentage points above the Haringey borough average of 87%. Its refusal rate of 8.7% is lowest in haringey.

Application and refusal breakdown— subscriber data
Residential extension / alteration
New residential
Change of use
Commercial development
Recent planning decisions— subscriber data
Reference
Address
Type
Outcome
Date
Committee members for this ward
Councillor
Party
Role
Interventions
Success rate
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%

Interventions: formal calls to bring an application before committee. Success rate: percentage where the committee sided with the councillor against officer recommendation.

At a glance[1]
WardCrouch End
CouncilHaringey
Applications1,101 (2020–26)
Approval rate91%
Refusal rate8.7%
Decision time8.7 wks avg
Ward members2 (both Labour)
Planning constraints[2]
Conservation areas2
Article 4 directions2
Listed buildings17
TPO trees43
Flood zoneZone 1 (low)
Sources & method
  1. [1]Ward approval and refusal rates, application counts and decision-time figures — London Borough of Haringey planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Conservation areas, Article 4 directions and heritage designations — the borough’s adopted Local Plan and conservation-area appraisals.
  3. [3]Committee interventions and councillor records — public planning committee minutes and published decision notices.
  4. [4]Application-type mix and refusal grounds — case-officer reports coded against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.