Development Intent
AtlasHaveringCouncillorsGillian_ford
Planning AtlasHaveringGillian Ford
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Cranham, Havering

Gillian Ford.

A Residents Association member representing Cranham in Havering. 17% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Cranham itself.

Residents AssociationCranham ward
Havering · Gillian Ford's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
12
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
17%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
How they intervene — by type
Ward support
5
Ward objection
3

How Gillian Ford acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Gillian Ford moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward support
Planning Committee
2019-01-17
Ward support
Planning Committee
2019-01-17
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2019-03-14
Planning Committee
2019-01-17
Planning Committee
2020-05-14
Planning Committee
2020-05-14
Strategic Planning Committee
2020-07-09
Planning Committee
2020-05-14
Ward support
Planning Committee
2019-01-17
Ward support
Planning Committee
2019-01-17
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2019-03-14
Show all 8 rows
Planning Committee
2019-01-17
Planning Committee
2020-05-14
Planning Committee
2020-05-14
Strategic Planning Committee
2020-07-09
Planning Committee
2020-05-14
At a glance
PartyResidents Association
WardCranham
Planning committeeNo
CouncilHavering
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Havering planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 6 of their 12 interventions (50%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.