Development Intent
AtlasHaveringWardsBrookrushg and Crow
Planning Atlas›Havering›Brook/RushG &Crow
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Ward · London Borough of Havering

Brook/RushG &Crow.

Brook/RushG &Crow sees an approval rate of 67% — 5 points below the Havering average across 8 substantive planning decisions, with a refusal rate of 33.3%.[1]

Havering8 applicationsSave
Brook/RushG &Crow · Havering
Loading map…
8
Applications 2022
Decided applications
67%
Approval rate
5pp below borough avg (71%)
33.3%
Refusal rate
11th highest of 30
8.7
Avg decision time
Wks · borough avg 9.2
Data from publicly available Havering planning records and committee minutes, 2022.
Ward overview

Brook/RushG &Crow recorded 8 substantive planning decisions over 2022, approving 67% of them — 5 percentage points below the Havering borough average of 71%. Its refusal rate of 33.3% is 11th highest of 30.

Application and refusal breakdown— subscriber data
Residential extension / alteration
New residential
Change of use
Commercial development
Recent planning decisions— subscriber data
Reference
Address
Type
Outcome
Date
Committee members for this ward
Councillor
Party
Role
Interventions
Success rate
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%

Interventions: formal calls to bring an application before committee. Success rate: percentage where the committee sided with the councillor against officer recommendation.

At a glance[1]
WardBrook/RushG &Crow
CouncilHavering
Applications8 (2022)
Approval rate67%
Refusal rate33.3%
Decision time8.7 wks avg
Ward members2 (both Labour)
Planning constraints[2]
Conservation areas2
Article 4 directions2
Listed buildings17
TPO trees43
Flood zoneZone 1 (low)
Sources & method
  1. [1]Ward approval and refusal rates, application counts and decision-time figures — London Borough of Havering planning register and published decision notices, 2022. · methodology
  2. [2]Conservation areas, Article 4 directions and heritage designations — the borough’s adopted Local Plan and conservation-area appraisals.
  3. [3]Committee interventions and councillor records — public planning committee minutes and published decision notices.
  4. [4]Application-type mix and refusal grounds — case-officer reports coded against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.