Development Intent
AtlasHillingdonWardsRuislip 2022
Planning AtlasHillingdonRUISLIP 2022
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Ward · London Borough of Hillingdon

RUISLIP 2022.

RUISLIP 2022 sees an approval rate of 84%5 points above the Hillingdon average across 822 substantive planning decisions, with a refusal rate of 16.0%.[1]

Hillingdon822 applicationsSave
RUISLIP 2022 · Hillingdon
Loading map…
822
Applications 2021–26
Decided applications
84%
Approval rate
5pp above borough avg (79%)
16.0%
Refusal rate
35th highest of 42
8.7
Avg decision time
Wks · borough avg 9.2
Data from publicly available Hillingdon planning records and committee minutes, 2021–26.
Ward overview

RUISLIP 2022 recorded 822 substantive planning decisions over 2021–26, approving 84% of them — 5 percentage points above the Hillingdon borough average of 79%. Its refusal rate of 16.0% is 35th highest of 42.

Application and refusal breakdown— subscriber data
Residential extension / alteration
New residential
Change of use
Commercial development
Recent planning decisions— subscriber data
Reference
Address
Type
Outcome
Date
Committee members for this ward
Councillor
Party
Role
Interventions
Success rate
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%
Cllr Mark Williams
Labour
Planning committee
23
47%
Cllr Emma Torres
Labour
Ward member
6
33%

Interventions: formal calls to bring an application before committee. Success rate: percentage where the committee sided with the councillor against officer recommendation.

At a glance[1]
WardRUISLIP 2022
CouncilHillingdon
Applications822 (2021–26)
Approval rate84%
Refusal rate16.0%
Decision time8.7 wks avg
Ward members2 (both Labour)
Planning constraints[2]
Conservation areas2
Article 4 directions2
Listed buildings17
TPO trees43
Flood zoneZone 1 (low)
Sources & method
  1. [1]Ward approval and refusal rates, application counts and decision-time figures — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 2021–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Conservation areas, Article 4 directions and heritage designations — the borough’s adopted Local Plan and conservation-area appraisals.
  3. [3]Committee interventions and councillor records — public planning committee minutes and published decision notices.
  4. [4]Application-type mix and refusal grounds — case-officer reports coded against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.