Development Intent
Planning AtlasKensington And ChelseaDavid Lindsay
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Norland, Kensington And Chelsea

David Lindsay.

A Conservative member representing Norland in Kensington And Chelsea.

ConservativeNorland ward
Kensington And Chelsea · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
7
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Privacy
7
Sunlight
7
Enclosure
6
Overlooking
1
Bulk mass
1
Subscribe to see what David Lindsay raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Ward objection
7

How David Lindsay acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where David Lindsay moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward objection
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Ward objection
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Ward objection
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Ward objection
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Ward objection
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Ward objection
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Show all 7 rows
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
Planning Applications Committee
2022-02-22
At a glance
PartyConservative
WardNorland
Planning committeeNo
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Kensington And Chelsea planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 0 of their 2 interventions (0%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.