Planning committee member · Pembridge, Kensington And Chelsea
Dori Schmetterling.
A Conservative member representing Pembridge in Kensington And Chelsea. Sits on the planning committee, with 400 recorded interventions — voting with the officer recommendation 57.1% of the time. 27% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Pembridge itself.
ConservativePembridge wardPlanning committee
Kensington And Chelsea · Dori Schmetterling's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
400
Interventions
at committee
9
Meetings
attended
27%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Noise
45
Design
36
Procedural
34
Heritage
31
Construction
30
Neighbour impact
27
Conservation
26
Bulk mass
20
Subscribe to see what Dori Schmetterling raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Declared interest
88
Supported
42
Questioned
38
Objected
24
Raised concern
21
Requested condition
16
How Dori Schmetterling acts at committee, by type of intervention.
Intervention history
Where Dori Schmetterling moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.
1–10 of 187
Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Voted against
—
Planning Applications Committee
2021-10-19
Objected
—
Planning Applications Committee
2021-10-19
Voted against
—
Planning Applications Committee
2021-10-19
Objected
—
Planning Applications Committee
2021-10-19
Show all 10 rows
Who decides here
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Kensington And Chelsea planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 22 of their 114 interventions (19%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.