Planning committee member · Courtfield, Kensington And Chelsea
Janet Evans.
A Conservative member representing Courtfield in Kensington And Chelsea. Sits on the planning committee, with 338 recorded interventions — voting with the officer recommendation 72.7% of the time. 0% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Courtfield itself.
ConservativeCourtfield wardPlanning committee
Kensington And Chelsea · Janet Evans's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
338
Interventions
at committee
18
Meetings
attended
0%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Character
37
Sunlight
35
Conservation
34
Bulk mass
30
Procedural
28
Heritage
25
Noise
22
Overlooking
16
Subscribe to see what Janet Evans raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Declared interest
54
Seconded
40
Objected
23
Abstained
17
Raised concern
16
Voted against
15
How Janet Evans acts at committee, by type of intervention.
Intervention history
Where Janet Evans moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.
1–10 of 151
Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Objected
—
Planning Applications Committee
2020-05-12
Raised concern
—
Planning Applications Committee
2020-05-12
Seconded
—
Planning Applications Committee
2020-04-28
Objected
—
Planning Applications Committee
2020-05-12
Raised concern
—
Planning Applications Committee
2020-05-12
Seconded
—
Planning Applications Committee
2020-04-28
Show all 10 rows
Who decides here
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Kensington And Chelsea planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 5 of their 74 interventions (7%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.