Planning committee member · Chelsea Riverside, Kensington And Chelsea
Sonia Elizabeth Zvedeniuk.
A Conservative member representing Chelsea Riverside in Kensington And Chelsea. Sits on the planning committee, with 403 recorded interventions — voting with the officer recommendation 100% of the time. 7% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Chelsea Riverside itself.
ConservativeChelsea Riverside wardPlanning committee
Kensington And Chelsea · Sonia Elizabeth Zvedeniuk's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
403
Interventions
at committee
3
Meetings
attended
7%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Character
82
Conservation
75
Design
65
Heritage
63
Bulk mass
42
Sunlight
19
Noise
18
Height
17
Subscribe to see what Sonia Elizabeth Zvedeniuk raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Objected
87
Seconded
58
Declared interest
24
Voted against
19
Supported
14
Raised concern
14
How Sonia Elizabeth Zvedeniuk acts at committee, by type of intervention.
Intervention history
Where Sonia Elizabeth Zvedeniuk moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.
1–10 of 216
Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Show all 10 rows
At a glance
PartyConservative
WardChelsea Riverside
Planning committeeMember
CouncilKensington And Chelsea
Who decides here
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Kensington And Chelsea planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 179 of their 383 interventions (47%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.