Planning committee member · Redcliffe, Kensington And Chelsea
Tom Bennett.
A Conservative member representing Redcliffe in Kensington And Chelsea. Sits on the planning committee, with 711 recorded interventions — voting with the officer recommendation 84.6% of the time. 10% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Redcliffe itself.
ConservativeRedcliffe wardPlanning committee
Kensington And Chelsea · Tom Bennett's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
711
Interventions
at committee
18
Meetings
attended
10%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Character
79
Design
71
Procedural
65
Bulk mass
59
Conservation
48
Construction
35
Overlooking
33
Height
32
Subscribe to see what Tom Bennett raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Declared interest
107
Moved approval
63
Supported
59
Objected
44
Moved refusal
30
Raised concern
28
How Tom Bennett acts at committee, by type of intervention.
Intervention history
Where Tom Bennett moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.
1–10 of 281
Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Moved refusal
—
Planning Applications Committee
2020-04-28
Moved refusal
—
Planning Applications Committee
2020-04-28
Show all 10 rows
Who decides here
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Kensington And Chelsea planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 179 of their 355 interventions (50%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.