Planning committee member · Hook & Chessington North, Kingston Upon Thames
Steph Archer.
A Liberal Democrat member representing Hook & Chessington North in Kingston Upon Thames. Sits on the planning committee, with 46 recorded interventions — voting with the officer recommendation 84.2% of the time. 0% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Hook & Chessington North itself.
Liberal DemocratHook & Chessington North wardPlanning committee
Kingston Upon Thames · Steph Archer's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
46
Interventions
at committee
16
Meetings
attended
0%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Character
4
Design
4
Sustainability
3
Residential
2
Community use
2
Parking
1
Materials
1
Ecology
1
Subscribe to see what Steph Archer raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Moved approval
12
Supported
3
Objected
3
Moved refusal
2
How Steph Archer acts at committee, by type of intervention.
Intervention history
Where Steph Archer moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.
1–10 of 20
Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Show all 10 rows
At a glance
PartyLiberal Democrat
WardHook & Chessington North
Planning committeeMember
CouncilKingston Upon Thames
Who decides here
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Kingston Upon Thames planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 28 of their 46 interventions (61%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.