Planning committee member · Bellingham, Lewisham
Jacq Paschoud.
A Labour member representing Bellingham in Lewisham. Sits on the planning committee, with 77 recorded interventions — voting with the officer recommendation 100% of the time. 5% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Bellingham itself.
LabourBellingham wardPlanning committee
Lewisham · Jacq Paschoud's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
77
Interventions
at committee
24
Meetings
attended
5%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Procedural
8
Community use
7
Affordable housing
7
Amenity space
4
Parking
4
Design
3
Conservation
2
Sunlight
2
Subscribe to see what Jacq Paschoud raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Questioned
26
Declared interest
3
Seconded
3
Moved approval
1
Raised concern
1
How Jacq Paschoud acts at committee, by type of intervention.
Intervention history
Where Jacq Paschoud moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.
1–10 of 31
Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Questioned
—
Planning Committee B
2022-02-01
Questioned
—
Planning Committee B
2022-02-01
Questioned
—
Planning Committee B
2022-02-01
Questioned
—
Planning Committee B
2022-02-01
Questioned
—
Planning Committee B
2022-02-01
Questioned
—
Planning Committee B
2022-02-01
Show all 10 rows
Who decides here
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Lewisham planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 20 of their 47 interventions (43%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.