Councillor · Wimbledon Town & Dundonald, Merton
Anthony John Fairclough.
A Liberal Democrat member representing Wimbledon Town & Dundonald in Merton. 0% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Wimbledon Town & Dundonald itself.
Liberal DemocratWimbledon Town & Dundonald ward
Merton · Anthony John Fairclough's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
54
Interventions
at committee
—
Meetings
attended
0%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Density
32
Amenity space
27
Neighbour impact
26
Character
20
Parking
19
Highways
18
Traffic
16
Community use
11
Subscribe to see what Anthony John Fairclough raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Ward objection
49
Ward support
5
How Anthony John Fairclough acts at committee, by type of intervention.
Intervention history
Where Anthony John Fairclough moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.
1–10 of 54
Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward objection
—
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-04-26
Ward objection
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-04-26
Ward objection
—
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-04-26
Ward objection
—
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-04-26
Ward objection
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-04-26
Ward objection
—
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-04-26
Show all 10 rows
Who decides here
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Merton planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 5 of their 11 interventions (45%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.