Councillor · Ravensbury, Merton
Stephen Alambritis.
A Labour member representing Ravensbury in Merton. 0% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Ravensbury itself.
LabourRavensbury ward
Merton · Stephen Alambritis's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
74
Interventions
at committee
—
Meetings
attended
0%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Public realm
5
Highways
4
Sustainability
3
Character
2
Accessibility
2
Affordable housing
1
Community use
1
Housing
1
Subscribe to see what Stephen Alambritis raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Declared interest
9
Supported
7
How Stephen Alambritis acts at committee, by type of intervention.
Intervention history
Where Stephen Alambritis moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.
Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Supported
—
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-06-15
Supported
—
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-06-15
Supported
—
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-04-26
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-04-26
Supported
—
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-06-15
Supported
—
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-06-15
Supported
—
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-04-26
Show all 7 rows
Development and Planning Applications Committee
2023-04-26
Who decides here
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Merton planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 35 of their 46 interventions (76%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.