Planning committee member · Ham, Petersham and Richmond Riverside, Richmond Upon Thames
Penelope Frost.
A Liberal Democrat member representing Ham, Petersham and Richmond Riverside in Richmond Upon Thames. Sits on the planning committee, with 131 recorded interventions. 0% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Ham, Petersham and Richmond Riverside itself.
Liberal DemocratHam, Petersham and Richmond Riverside wardPlanning committee · Chair
Richmond Upon Thames · Penelope Frost's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
131
Interventions
at committee
—
Meetings
attended
0%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Procedural
7
Character
6
Heritage
5
Community use
4
Education
3
Traffic
3
Conservation
3
Health
1
Subscribe to see what Penelope Frost raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Declared interest
35
Ward support
19
Ward objection
4
Supported
4
Raised concern
3
How Penelope Frost acts at committee, by type of intervention.
Intervention history
Where Penelope Frost moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.
1–10 of 30
Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Show all 10 rows
At a glance
PartyLiberal Democrat
WardHam, Petersham and Richmond Riverside
Planning committeeMember · Chair
CouncilRichmond Upon Thames
Who decides here
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Richmond Upon Thames planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 65 of their 131 interventions (50%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.