Development Intent
AtlasSouthwarkCouncillorsAdam_hood
Planning AtlasSouthwarkAdam Hood
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Planning committee member · Surrey Docks, Southwark

Adam Hood.

A Liberal Democrat member representing Surrey Docks in Southwark. Sits on the planning committee, with 31 recorded interventions. 4% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Surrey Docks itself.

Liberal DemocratSurrey Docks wardPlanning committee
Southwark · Adam Hood's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
31
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
4%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Procedural
1
Subscribe to see what Adam Hood raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Ward support
2
Declared interest
2

How Adam Hood acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Adam Hood moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2025-07-01
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2025-07-01
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2025-07-01
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2025-07-01
At a glance
PartyLiberal Democrat
WardSurrey Docks
Planning committeeMember
CouncilSouthwark
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Southwark planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 27 of their 27 interventions (100%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.