Development Intent
Planning AtlasWaltham ForestMarie Pye
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Councillor · Leytonstone, Waltham Forest

Marie Pye.

A Labour member representing Leytonstone in Waltham Forest. 17% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Leytonstone itself.

LabourLeytonstone ward
Waltham Forest · Marie Pye's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
97
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
17%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
What they raise — by topicSubscriber
Procedural
2
Community use
2
Public realm
2
Subscribe to see what Marie Pye raises, by real topicSubscribe to unlock →
How they intervene — by type
Declared interest
3
Ward support
3
Ward objection
1
Supported
1

How Marie Pye acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Marie Pye moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2024-03-05
Supported
Planning Committee
2024-03-05
Ward support
Planning Committee
2024-03-05
Planning Committee
2023-03-07
Planning Committee
2023-03-07
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2024-03-05
Supported
Planning Committee
2024-03-05
Ward support
Planning Committee
2024-03-05
Show all 5 rows
Planning Committee
2023-03-07
Planning Committee
2023-03-07
At a glance
PartyLabour
WardLeytonstone
Planning committeeNo
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Waltham Forest planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 48 of their 97 interventions (49%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.