Jeanne Gleize.
Active — last recorded decision May 2026
A case officer at Brent with an approval rate of 65% across 412 decided planning applications, spanning 15 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.
Topic mentions per 1,000 words of their own report text (boilerplate stripped), indexed against all parsed Brent reports. Attention, not stance.
Mark = borough average (1×). Bar capped at 2×.
Gleize's reports carefully track application validation history and deviations from a previously approved scheme (e.g. an enforcement case opened because a rear dormer was built wider than approved), and cite specific decibel figures from Environmental Health's noise assessment of proposed air conditioning/plant units rather than a general 'no objection' statement.
· tracks an application’s validation history explicitly, including where plans were made invalid and revised for accuracy
· identifies the precise deviation between a built structure and its previously approved plans that triggered an enforcement case
· cites the specific decibel figure from Environmental Health's noise assessment of plant/AC units rather than a general no-objection statement
· what this officer's reports consistently look for: an application's validation history, including where plans were initially invalid and later corrected
· what this officer's reports consistently look for: the precise way a built structure deviates from its previously approved plans, where an enforcement case is linked
· what this officer's reports consistently look for: the specific decibel figure from an Environmental Health plant noise assessment, not a general no-objection statement
“It is understood that the present application seeks to address and regularise this. The present application was initially validated on 22/11/2021, however it was made invalid as the plans were incorrect and did not show the existing ground levels accurately.”
21/2734
“The Council’s Environmental Heath Team has reviewed the application and noted that the combined noise level for all 5x units would be 54dB therefore the noise level at the nearest residential would be 42dB.”
21/2734
Measured from 166 published Brent officer reports written by this officer, with recited policy boilerplate stripped before any counting. These describe how this officer works and writes — they are not outcome predictions. Every quote is from a named public report.
The policies this officer cites most in their own reports — times cited across 166 parsed reports. Whether refusals citing each survive appeal isn't traced per policy yet.
Show all 15 rows
Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.
- [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Brent planning register and published decision notices, 2021–26. · methodology
- [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
- [3]Condition load — Brent's decision-notice parsing is limited coverage, so no borough or officer figure is shown.
- [4]"How this officer decides", the policy playbook and all quotes — parsed from 166 published Brent officer reports written by this officer, recited policy boilerplate stripped before counting; disposition text coded from their own reasoning with every quote machine-verified verbatim. Descriptive of how they work — not outcome predictions.