Development Intent
AtlasCamdenOfficersConnie Marinetto
Case officer · Camden Planning

Connie Marinetto.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Camden with an approval rate of 93% across 224 decided planning applications, spanning 20 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer224 decisions93% approvalSave
Camden · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
224
Applications
2024–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%93%202494%202588%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate93% · 34th of 76
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Connie Marinetto's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Connie Marinetto decided — 24 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

D2HeritageCamden plan
19 times cited
D1DesignCamden plan
16 times cited
A1Managing the impact of development Camden plan
6 times cited
A4Noise and vibrationCamden plan
4 times cited
A3Biodiversity Camden plan
4 times cited
A2Open space Camden plan
3 times cited
DH1Camden plan
2 times cited
DH2Camden plan
2 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2024–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
2026/2160/P
Full Planning Permission
2026-05-28
2026/2230/L
Listed Building Consent
2026-05-21
2026/2160/P
Full Planning Permission
2026-05-28
2026/2230/L
Listed Building Consent
2026-05-21
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 224 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Baily Garner LLP
2. PMV Planning
3. ANSELL & BAILEY Ltd Chartered Architects
4. Bidwells LLP
At a glance
OfficerConnie Marinetto
BoroughCamden
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications224 (2024–26)
Approval rate93%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Camden planning register and published decision notices, 2024–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Camden decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.