Development Intent
AtlasCamdenOfficersSarah White
Planning Atlas›Camden›Sarah White
Case officer · Camden Planning

Sarah White.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Camden with an approval rate of 79% across 157 decided planning applications, spanning 26 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer157 decisions79% approvalSave
Camden · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
157
Applications
2020–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%0%202067%202175%202277%202379%202482%202578%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate79% · 71st of 76
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Sarah White's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Sarah White decided — 13 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

D2HeritageCamden plan
8 times cited
D1DesignCamden plan
7 times cited
CC2Adapting to climate changeCamden plan
2 times cited
CC3Water and floodingCamden plan
2 times cited
SI13London Plan
2 times cited
A2Open space Camden plan
2 times cited
DM1Delivery and monitoringCamden plan
1 times cited
C5Safety and securityCamden plan
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
17
93%
17
80%
13
78%
11
88%
11
78%
11
57%
9
60%
8
50%
8
100%
8
71%
7
83%
5
33%
5
80%
4
75%
3
50%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
2
100%
1
0%
1
–
1
–
1
0%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
17
93%
17
80%
13
78%
Show all 26 rows
11
88%
11
78%
11
57%
9
60%
8
50%
8
100%
8
71%
7
83%
5
33%
5
80%
4
75%
3
50%
3
100%
3
100%
3
100%
2
100%
1
0%
1
–
1
–
1
0%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
2026/1557/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2026-04-20
2026/1517/P
Full Planning Permission
—
2026-04-15
2026/1557/P
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2026-04-20
2026/1517/P
Full Planning Permission
—
2026-04-15
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 157 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. SM Planning
2. NTA Planning LLP
3. Hamilton Grey Heritage Services
4. Focus Town Planning Consultants
At a glance
OfficerSarah White
BoroughCamden
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications157 (2020–26)
Approval rate79%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Camden planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Camden decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.