Development Intent
AtlasEnfieldOfficersJonathan Ashworth
Case officer · Enfield Planning

Jonathan Ashworth.

Last recorded decision Nov 2021 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Enfield with an approval rate of 59% across 30 decided planning applications, spanning 12 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer30 decisions59% approvalSave
Enfield · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
30
Applications
2020–21
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%0%202061%202167%2022
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate59% · 54th of 63
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Jonathan Ashworth's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Jonathan Ashworth decided — 26 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
6 times cited
CP30MAINTAINING AND IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THE BUILT AND OPEN ENVIRONMENT All developments and interventions in the public realm must be high quality and design-lEnfield plan
6 times cited
DMD8SPD / guidance
6 times cited
DMD37SPD / guidance
5 times cited
DMD11SPD / guidance
4 times cited
CP5HOUSING TYPES The Council will seek to ensure that new developments offer a range of housing sizes to meetEnfield plan
3 times cited
D6London Plan
3 times cited
CP4HOUSING QUALITY New housingEnfield plan
3 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–21.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
21/02900/FUL
Full
Refused
2022-01-18
21/04077/FUL
Full
Approved
2022-01-05
21/02900/FUL
Full
Refused
2022-01-18
21/04077/FUL
Full
Approved
2022-01-05
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 30 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. John Perrin & Sons Ltd
2. H and J Architecture
3. Rees Architects
4. RPS Group
At a glance
OfficerJonathan Ashworth
BoroughEnfield
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications30 (2020–21)
Approval rate59%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Enfield planning register and published decision notices, 2020–21. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Enfield decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.