Development Intent
AtlasEnfieldOfficersJustin Reid Weekes
Planning Atlas›Enfield›Justin Reid-Weekes
Case officer · Enfield Planning

Justin Reid-Weekes.

Last recorded decision Mar 2021 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Enfield with an approval rate of 49% across 91 decided planning applications, spanning 12 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer91 decisions49% approvalSave
Enfield · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
91
Applications
2020–21
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%46%202057%2021
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate49% · 58th of 63
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Justin Reid-Weekes's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Justin Reid-Weekes decided — 70 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

CP30MAINTAINING AND IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THE BUILT AND OPEN ENVIRONMENT All developments and interventions in the public realm must be high quality and design-lEnfield plan
37 times cited
DMD8SPD / guidance
33 times cited
DMD37SPD / guidance
32 times cited
NPPFNPPF
28 times cited
DMD6SPD / guidance
25 times cited
DMD11SPD / guidance
23 times cited
7.4Superseded
19 times cited
7.6Superseded
18 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
14
36%
11
36%
11
73%
10
50%
10
50%
9
38%
8
75%
5
75%
4
50%
4
25%
3
67%
2
0%
14
36%
11
36%
11
73%
Show all 12 rows
10
50%
10
50%
9
38%
8
75%
5
75%
4
50%
4
25%
3
67%
2
0%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–21.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
20/04069/FUL
Full
Approved
2021-07-16
20/00481/FUL
Full
Approved
2021-06-27
20/04069/FUL
Full
Approved
2021-07-16
20/00481/FUL
Full
Approved
2021-06-27
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 91 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. ELA Design
2. ERK STRUCTURAL & DESIGN CONSULTANCY
3. Design Room
4. nineteen47 Ltd
At a glance
OfficerJustin Reid-Weekes
BoroughEnfield
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications91 (2020–21)
Approval rate49%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Enfield planning register and published decision notices, 2020–21. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Enfield decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.