Development Intent
AtlasEnfieldOfficersMonika Vistartaite
Case officer · Enfield Planning

Monika Vistartaite.

Last recorded decision Aug 2022 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Enfield with an approval rate of 25% across 6 decided planning applications, spanning 5 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer6 decisions25% approvalSave
Enfield · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
6
Applications
2021–22
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate25% · 63rd of 63
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Monika Vistartaite's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Monika Vistartaite decided — 4 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
2 times cited
CP21DELIVERING SUSTAINABLE INFRASTRUCTUREEnfield plan
2 times cited
CP28MANAGING FLOOD RISK THROUGH DEVELOPMENT The Council will take a risk-based approach to development and flood risk, directing developmentEnfield plan
1 times cited
DMD59SPD / guidance
1 times cited
60SPD / guidance
1 times cited
61SPD / guidance
1 times cited
62SPD / guidance
1 times cited
DMD51SPD / guidance
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021–22.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
21/02850/HOU
Householder
Refused
2023-07-28
21/02850/HOU
Householder
Refused
2023-07-28
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 6 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. PPLX Architects
2. Warner Planning Ltd
3. Studio 136 Architects Ltd
4. Seesaw Studios
At a glance
OfficerMonika Vistartaite
BoroughEnfield
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications6 (2021–22)
Approval rate25%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Enfield planning register and published decision notices, 2021–22. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Enfield decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.