Development Intent
AtlasEnfieldOfficersSana Akram
Case officer · Enfield Planning

Sana Akram.

Last recorded decision Jul 2020 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Enfield with an approval rate of 92% across 13 decided planning applications, spanning 6 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer13 decisions92% approvalSave
Enfield · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
13
Applications
2020
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate92% · 3rd of 63
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Sana Akram's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Sana Akram decided — 11 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

CP20SUSTAINABLE ENERGY USE AND ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE The Council will require all new developments, and where possible via a retrofitting process inEnfield plan
1 times cited
5.2Superseded
1 times cited
5.3Superseded
1 times cited
5.7Superseded
1 times cited
5.9Superseded
1 times cited
NPPFNPPF
1 times cited
CP30MAINTAINING AND IMPROVING THE QUALITY OF THE BUILT AND OPEN ENVIRONMENT All developments and interventions in the public realm must be high quality and design-lEnfield plan
1 times cited
CP36BIODIVERSITY The Council will seek to protect, enhance, restore or add to biodiversity interests within the Borough,Enfield plan
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
4
75%
2
100%
Show all 6 rows
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
20/01685/FUL
Full
Approved
2020-09-29
20/01230/HOU
Householder
Approved
2020-07-28
20/01685/FUL
Full
Approved
2020-09-29
20/01230/HOU
Householder
Approved
2020-07-28
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 13 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. ERK STRUCTURAL & DESIGN CONSULTANCY
2. Rahul Taheem LTD
3. WSP Indigo
4. Architectural Design London
At a glance
OfficerSana Akram
BoroughEnfield
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications13 (2020)
Approval rate92%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Enfield planning register and published decision notices, 2020. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Enfield decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.