Development Intent
AtlasGreenwichOfficersGintare Labanauskaite
Planning Atlas›Greenwich›Gintare Labanauskaite
Case officer · Greenwich Planning

Gintare Labanauskaite.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Greenwich with an approval rate of 76% across 765 decided planning applications, spanning 23 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer765 decisions76% approvalSave
Greenwich · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
765
Applications
2020–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%78%202064%202173%202280%202386%202483%202583%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate76% · 28th of 57
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Gintare Labanauskaite's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Gintare Labanauskaite decided — 68 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DH1DesignGreenwich plan
61 times cited
DH(A)Greenwich plan
52 times cited
7.4Superseded
43 times cited
DH(B)Greenwich plan
22 times cited
7.6Superseded
21 times cited
D3London Plan
20 times cited
DH(H)Greenwich plan
14 times cited
DH3Heritage AssetsGreenwich plan
13 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
106
80%
76
82%
76
83%
61
85%
59
76%
49
77%
41
53%
39
94%
37
74%
37
81%
35
81%
32
58%
24
77%
23
50%
21
60%
17
67%
10
75%
9
71%
6
83%
2
50%
2
0%
1
0%
1
100%
106
80%
76
82%
76
83%
Show all 23 rows
61
85%
59
76%
49
77%
41
53%
39
94%
37
74%
37
81%
35
81%
32
58%
24
77%
23
50%
21
60%
17
67%
10
75%
9
71%
6
83%
2
50%
2
0%
1
0%
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
26/1074/HD
Householders
Withdrawn
2026-05-22
26/0906/HD
Householders
Approved
2026-05-14
26/1074/HD
Householders
Withdrawn
2026-05-22
26/0906/HD
Householders
Approved
2026-05-14
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 765 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. M.A. Newsome & Co Ltd
2. ANDERSON NORTH PARTNERSHIP
3. James Kay Architects
4. Resi
At a glance
OfficerGintare Labanauskaite
BoroughGreenwich
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications765 (2020–26)
Approval rate76%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Greenwich planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Greenwich decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.