Development Intent
AtlasHammersmith and FulhamPolicy
Planning Atlas›Hammersmith And Fulham›Policy
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Hammersmith And Fulham · Local Plan · Policy

Policy.

The policies that actually decide outcomes in Hammersmith And Fulham — how often each is cited in the officers' own reports, where it bites hardest, and who leans on it. The plan text is the rule; this is the behaviour.

1,639 citations228 reports parsedHammersmith And Fulham Local Plan …
Hammersmith And Fulham · policy map
Where policy is quoted most — by ward
Fewer ~0
More citations ~24
At a glance
1,639[1]
Total citations
across 228 officer reports
2%[1]
Citations on refusals
borough baseline — see the In refusals column
Hammersmith And Fulham[1]
Development plan
most-cited framework in reports
—
CIL (residential)
schedule not yet sourced
—
5-year land supply
position statement not yet sourced
Citations by policy — what gets invoked 🔒click a policy — reshapes the map
DC1 · Built environment quality and integration
221
DC4 · High standard of design for alterations and extensions
211
HO11 · Detailed Residential Standards
180
DC8 · Heritage and conservation: Buildings at risk
151
CC11 · Noise and Vibration Control for Developments
140
CC3 · Flood Risk Assessment Requirement
109
CC4 · Minimising surface water run-off with Sustainable Drainage Systems
101
CC2 · Sustainable Design and Construction in Major Developments
81
Full citation counts are subscriber dataSubscribe to see the counts →
What kind of ground gets cited[1]
Housing delivery15%
Design & heritage32%
Amenity9%
Highways & transport3%
Sustainability16%
Other grounds26%

Grounds classified from each policy's own cited title. Click a slice — reshapes the map.

The policies that decide outcomes — Hammersmith And Fulham

Every plan policy recurring in Hammersmith And Fulham officer reports, ranked by how often it's cited. Click a policy for its full record — and the officer who leans on it most.

PolicyCitationsIn refusalsAppeal survivalCites it most
HO11 — Detailed Residential Standards1802% · 1.3×65%subscriber data
The full policy roster and per-policy officer breakdown are subscriber data.Subscribe to see all policies →

Citation counts from Hammersmith And Fulham officer reports.[1] “In refusals” = share of a policy's citations that sit on refusals; × = that share against the borough average (needs 20+ citations). Appeal survival = of PINS appeal decisions citing the policy, the share dismissed (refusal held); a rate needs 5+ decisive appeals, fewer show the count. Methodology →

The borough framework

The development-plan documents Hammersmith And Fulham officers actually cite, counted across parsed reports. CIL and land-supply figures aren't sourced yet and are shown as pending, not estimated.

Most cited
Hammersmith And Fulham Local Plan (adopted)
1,638 report mentions
#2
Local guidance / SPD
1 report mentions
The hierarchy
National — NPPFpage pending
Strategic — London Planpage pending
Local — Hammersmith And Fulham plan →
What wins here — approval rate by application type[2]

Bar = volume · figure = approval rate, across Hammersmith And Fulham's substantive decisions.

Full / major planning
92%
Conditions & amendments
94%
Lawful development
85%
Prior approval
49%
Listed building
98%
Householder
100%
Grounds for refusal at committee[3]

Why the planning committee refuses applications, from 70 refusals in the loaded minutes. Committee refusals are relatively few — most decisions are settled by officers.

Design Character
29
Amenity
27
Transport Highway
26
Heritage Conservation
19
Neighbour Impact
15
Overdevelopment
14
Land Use
12
Environmental
8
Policies cited on refusal — borough-wide[4]

The policies most often cited on Hammersmith And Fulham refusal notices — the official refusal side of the citation record above.

NPPF4×
DC1, CF3, CC11, CC13 of the Local Plan (2018)4×
DC1, DC4 and DC8 of the Local Plan (2018)3×
DC1, DC4 and DC8 of the Local Plan3×
BM2, CAC3 and HS4 of the Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning Document (2018)3×
Local Plan (2018) Policies DC1, DC4 and DC83×
DC1, DC4 and HO11 of the Local Plan (2018)3×
AH1, AH2 and CAG3 of the Planning Guidance Supplementary Planning Document (2018)3×
D3 and policies DC2 and HO11 of the Local Plan 20183×
DC1, DC4 and HO11 of the Hammersmith and Fulham Local Plan (2018)3×

8 high-confidence refusal notices parsed for Hammersmith And Fulham.

Sources & method
  1. [1]Policy citations, per-policy officer counts and ward citation counts — parsed from 228 published Hammersmith And Fulham officer reports (delegated and committee), joined to the canonical application record for wards. Approvals included — refusal notices alone only show the refusal side.
  2. [2]Approval rate by application type — Hammersmith And Fulham's substantive decision record. · methodology
  3. [3]Committee refusal grounds and committee-cited policies — published Hammersmith And Fulham planning-committee minutes. · committee record
  4. [4]Borough-wide refusal-notice policy citations — decision-notice parsing (high-confidence notices only).
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.