Development Intent
AtlasHammersmith and Fulham
London Planning Authority · Inner London

Hammersmith And Fulham.

Hammersmith And Fulham is a London borough with an approval rate of 92% across 9,026 substantive planning decisions spanning 27 wards. Most decisions here are made under delegation rather than at committee.[1]

Inner London27 wards217 appealsSave
Hammersmith And Fulham · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glance · tap a metric to drill into this boroughAll investigations →
What wins here — Hammersmith And Fulham's policy playbook[3]

What Hammersmith And Fulham actually approves — its whole decision record, by application type — and the grounds its committee refuses on. Click through for the refusal grounds and the policies cited in the minutes.

Full / major
Conditions
Lawful
Prior approval
Data from publicly available Hammersmith And Fulham planning records and committee minutes 2020-01 – 2026-05.
Case officers
Officer
Active
Applications
Approval rate
Mostly decides
Active
666
93%
Full / major planning
Active
595
91%
Full / major planning
to 2025-09
508
96%
Full / major planning
to 2025-01
495
96%
Full / major planning
Active
492
98%
Full / major planning
Active
399
91%
Full / major planning
Active
387
99%
Full / major planning
to 2022-08
381
94%
Full / major planning
to 2024-11
333
87%
Full / major planning
to 2021-12
329
94%
Full / major planning
Active
326
96%
Full / major planning
to 2022-06
292
87%
Full / major planning
Active
666
93%
Full / major planning
Active
595
91%
Full / major planning
to 2025-09
508
96%
Full / major planning
Show all 12 rows
to 2025-01
495
96%
Full / major planning
Active
492
98%
Full / major planning
Active
399
91%
Full / major planning
Active
387
99%
Full / major planning
to 2022-08
381
94%
Full / major planning
to 2024-11
333
87%
Full / major planning
to 2021-12
329
94%
Full / major planning
Active
326
96%
Full / major planning
to 2022-06
292
87%
Full / major planning

Approval rates per officer, 2020–2026. Based on decided applications only. All Hammersmith And Fulham officers →

Planning committee members
Councillor
Ward
Party
Active
Cttee votes
Leaning
Munster
Conservative
Active
561
subscribers
College Park & Old Oak
Labour
Active
172
subscribers
Grove
Labour
Active
51
subscribers
West Kensington
Labour
Active
46
subscribers
Parsons Green & Sandford
Conservative
Active
43
subscribers
Coningham
Labour
Active
32
subscribers
Coningham
Labour
Active
31
subscribers
Wendell Park
Labour
Active
29
subscribers
Munster
Conservative
Active
561
subscribers
College Park & Old Oak
Labour
Active
172
subscribers
Grove
Labour
Active
51
subscribers
Show all 8 rows
West Kensington
Labour
Active
46
subscribers
Parsons Green & Sandford
Conservative
Active
43
subscribers
Coningham
Labour
Active
32
subscribers
Coningham
Labour
Active
31
subscribers
Wendell Park
Labour
Active
29
subscribers

Councillors on Hammersmith And Fulham's planning committee, by their recorded committee votes. “Leaning” = whether they tend to vote to approve or refuse. Full voting records →

Wards — ranked
Ward
Applications
Approval rate
Refusal rate
350
97%
2.6%
281
97%
2.7%
328
96%
4.1%
167
95%
4.5%
201
95%
4.8%
238
95%
5.1%
303
94%
6.0%
329
94%
6.1%
246
93%
6.8%
536
93%
7.2%
515
92%
8.2%
280
92%
8.3%
430
92%
8.3%
289
91%
9.4%
457
91%
9.4%
744
90%
9.7%
161
89%
10.6%
225
89%
11.2%
239
87%
12.6%
155
87%
12.8%
350
97%
2.6%
281
97%
2.7%
328
96%
4.1%
Show all 27 rows
167
95%
4.5%
201
95%
4.8%
238
95%
5.1%
303
94%
6.0%
329
94%
6.1%
246
93%
6.8%
536
93%
7.2%
515
92%
8.2%
280
92%
8.3%
430
92%
8.3%
289
91%
9.4%
457
91%
9.4%
744
90%
9.7%
161
89%
10.6%
225
89%
11.2%
239
87%
12.6%
155
87%
12.8%

Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the ward profile.

Consultant performance
Consultant
Applications
Approval rate
1. glenn williams / Bluelime
119
100%
2. More Space / MoreSpace
110
95%
3. Mr Joe Marshall / Silver Teal Ltd
105
100%
4. Jonathan Wright / Planning Solutions (London) ltd
74
89%
5. Mr Mark Finney / SEB + FIN Architects Ltd.
62
100%
6. Mr architect nuspace / nuspace
56
86%
7. Mr Stern / SAM Planning services
53
100%
8. Richard Fisher / CEDC
46
90%
1. glenn williams / Bluelime
119
100%
2. More Space / MoreSpace
110
95%
3. Mr Joe Marshall / Silver Teal Ltd
105
100%
Show all 8 rows
4. Jonathan Wright / Planning Solutions (London) ltd
74
89%
5. Mr Mark Finney / SEB + FIN Architects Ltd.
62
100%
6. Mr architect nuspace / nuspace
56
86%
7. Mr Stern / SAM Planning services
53
100%
8. Richard Fisher / CEDC
46
90%

Rankings based on applications submitted and decided. Performance from public planning records.

At a glance[2]
BoroughHammersmith And Fulham
London approval avg81%
London overturn avg26%
Total appeals217
Appeals allowed94 (43.3%)
Conditions / approval6.31
Local plan

The adopted Hammersmith And Fulham Local Plan (targets, CIL, plan period) is a separate source still being loaded. What the record already shows: which applications win here, and the grounds refusals cite.

What wins →

Sources & method
  1. [1]Approval rates, decision times, delegation and ward breakdowns — London Borough of Hammersmith And Fulham planning register and published decision notices, 2020–2026. · methodology
  2. [2]London benchmarks, appeal overturn rates, appeals allowed and costs awarded — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) published appeal decisions. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]“What wins here” — Hammersmith And Fulham’s substantive decision record grouped by application type; committee refusal grounds and cited policies coded from published committee minutes.
  4. [4]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hammersmith And Fulham grant/split decision notices, parsed from the published notice text (221 high-confidence notices).
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.