Development Intent
AtlasHarrowOfficersHmi Harmeet Minhas
Planning Atlas›Harrow›HMI Harmeet Minhas
Case officer · Harrow Planning

HMI Harmeet Minhas.

Last recorded decision Nov 2022 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Harrow with an approval rate of 80% across 5 decided planning applications, spanning 5 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer5 decisions80% approvalSave
Harrow · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
5
Applications
2021–22
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%50%2022100%2023
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate80% · 23rd of 72
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of HMI Harmeet Minhas's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies this officer cites most across their decisions — how often each appears, and whether refusals citing it survive appeal.

In development — policy citations are coded from officer reports, and that parsing hasn't run for Harrow yet. Nothing is shown until it is real.

Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
1
100%
1
100%
1
0%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
0%
Show all 5 rows
1
100%
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021–22.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
P/4464/21
Full Planning Application
Approved
2023-06-26
P/0218/22
Full Planning Application
Approved
2023-06-26
P/4464/21
Full Planning Application
Approved
2023-06-26
P/0218/22
Full Planning Application
Approved
2023-06-26
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 5 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Architecture Way Ahead Limited
2. APSurveying Limited
3. KKR Planning & Design Ltd
At a glance
OfficerHMI Harmeet Minhas
BoroughHarrow
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications5 (2021–22)
Approval rate80%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Harrow planning register and published decision notices, 2021–22. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Harrow decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.