Development Intent
AtlasHillingdonOfficersCris Lancaster
Planning Atlas›Hillingdon›Cris Lancaster
Case officer · Hillingdon Planning

Cris Lancaster.

Last recorded decision Oct 2020 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Hillingdon with an approval rate of 66% across 226 decided planning applications, spanning 19 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer226 decisions66% approvalSave
Hillingdon · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
226
Applications
2020
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%67%202038%2021
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate66% · 56th of 59
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Cris Lancaster's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Cris Lancaster decided — 85 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
11 times cited
DMCI1ADevelopment of New Education FloorspaceHillingdon plan
1 times cited
DMT2Highways ImpactsHillingdon plan
1 times cited
DMT5Pedestrians and CyclistsHillingdon plan
1 times cited
DMT6Vehicle ParkingHillingdon plan
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
30
61%
27
73%
21
76%
20
72%
20
75%
20
63%
18
78%
16
63%
11
64%
9
56%
8
50%
5
67%
5
75%
4
25%
4
50%
3
33%
3
33%
1
0%
1
100%
30
61%
27
73%
21
76%
Show all 19 rows
20
72%
20
75%
20
63%
18
78%
16
63%
11
64%
9
56%
8
50%
5
67%
5
75%
4
25%
4
50%
3
33%
3
33%
1
0%
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
74982/APP/2020/592
Planning Application
Refused
2021-12-14
22910/APP/2020/2870
Planning Application
Refused
2021-01-28
74982/APP/2020/592
Planning Application
Refused
2021-12-14
22910/APP/2020/2870
Planning Application
Refused
2021-01-28
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 226 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Mr James Hughes The Market Design & Build
2. Ms Maria Golasowska M G D C LTD.
3. Mr Kumar Talpade DNT Design Services Ltd
4. Mr P Webb Avanti Design PO Box
At a glance
OfficerCris Lancaster
BoroughHillingdon
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications226 (2020)
Approval rate66%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 2020. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hillingdon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.