Development Intent
AtlasHillingdonOfficersIan Thynne
Planning Atlas›Hillingdon›Ian Thynne
Case officer · Hillingdon Planning

Ian Thynne.

Last recorded decision Jun 2020 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Hillingdon with an approval rate of – across 7 decided planning applications, spanning 5 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer7 decisions– approvalSave
Hillingdon · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
7
Applications
2020
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Ian Thynne's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies this officer cites most across their decisions — how often each appears, and whether refusals citing it survive appeal.

In development — policy citations are coded from officer reports, and that parsing hasn't run for Hillingdon yet. Nothing is shown until it is real.

Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
2
–
2
–
1
–
1
–
1
–
2
–
2
–
1
–
Show all 5 rows
1
–
1
–

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
4450/APP/2020/43
Planning Application
No determination
2025-01-29
73281/APP/2020/370
Planning Application
No determination
2025-01-28
4450/APP/2020/43
Planning Application
No determination
2025-01-29
73281/APP/2020/370
Planning Application
No determination
2025-01-28
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 7 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. DPP Uk Ltd Milburn House Dean Street Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1
2. S Coyne Suzi Coyne Planning
3. Thomas Broderick WRM Ltd
At a glance
OfficerIan Thynne
BoroughHillingdon
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications7 (2020)
Approval rate–
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 2020. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hillingdon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.