Development Intent
AtlasHillingdonOfficersKelly Sweeney
Planning Atlas›Hillingdon›Kelly Sweeney
Case officer · Hillingdon Planning

Kelly Sweeney.

Last recorded decision Aug 2021 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Hillingdon with an approval rate of 67% across 484 decided planning applications, spanning 22 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer484 decisions67% approvalSave
Hillingdon · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
484
Applications
2020–21
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%63%202071%2021
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate67% · 55th of 59
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Kelly Sweeney's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Kelly Sweeney decided — 111 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DMT6Vehicle ParkingHillingdon plan
1 times cited
6.13Superseded
1 times cited
DMHB11Design of New DevelopmentHillingdon plan
1 times cited
NPPFNPPF
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
61
72%
50
69%
34
61%
33
75%
28
86%
27
63%
25
46%
22
59%
22
77%
21
67%
18
67%
17
71%
16
47%
15
62%
15
54%
15
53%
14
79%
14
86%
13
46%
9
78%
9
67%
6
100%
61
72%
50
69%
34
61%
Show all 22 rows
33
75%
28
86%
27
63%
25
46%
22
59%
22
77%
21
67%
18
67%
17
71%
16
47%
15
62%
15
54%
15
53%
14
79%
14
86%
13
46%
9
78%
9
67%
6
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–21.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
76291/APP/2021/1156
Planning Application
Withdrawn
2021-10-12
50707/APP/2021/643
Planning Application
Approved
2021-09-14
76291/APP/2021/1156
Planning Application
Withdrawn
2021-10-12
50707/APP/2021/643
Planning Application
Approved
2021-09-14
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 484 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Mr James Hughes The Market Design & Build,
2. Mr Rabin Khadka Blue Architecture Limited
3. TINA PATEL Formed Architects & Designers Third Floor, Gable House,
4. Mr Kunal Vekaria Lawrence Vacher LLP Congress House
At a glance
OfficerKelly Sweeney
BoroughHillingdon
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications484 (2020–21)
Approval rate67%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 2020–21. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hillingdon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.