Development Intent
AtlasHounslowOfficersRupinder Dhoot
Case officer · Hounslow Planning

Rupinder Dhoot.

Recently active — last recorded decision Sep 2025

A case officer at Hounslow with an approval rate of 56% across 269 decided planning applications, spanning 20 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer269 decisions56% approvalSave
Hounslow · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
269
Applications
2020–25
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%51%202053%202168%202240%202371%202475%2025
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate56% · 32nd of 35
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Rupinder Dhoot's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Rupinder Dhoot decided — 87 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

EQ1- Energy and carbon reductionHounslow plan
15 times cited
EQ2Sustainable design and constructionHounslow plan
15 times cited
EC2Sustainable local transport network developmentHounslow plan
12 times cited
SI2London Plan
10 times cited
CC2Urban design and architectureHounslow plan
5 times cited
EQ5- noiseHounslow plan
4 times cited
EQ4- air qualityHounslow plan
3 times cited
EQ7- Sustainable waste managementHounslow plan
2 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–25.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
P/2024/1146
PF-Full Applications
2026-06-12
P/2022/3013
Major Housing 10 units or more
Withdrawn
2025-08-22
P/2024/1146
PF-Full Applications
2026-06-12
P/2022/3013
Major Housing 10 units or more
Withdrawn
2025-08-22
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 269 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data

No named planning consultants on this officer's decided applications.

At a glance
OfficerRupinder Dhoot
BoroughHounslow
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications269 (2020–25)
Approval rate56%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hounslow planning register and published decision notices, 2020–25. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hounslow decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.