Planning Inspector · PINS
Jonathan Edwards.
A planning inspector deciding appeals across London. Has decided 28 appeals from 9 boroughs, allowing 21% of appeals — below the London average of 26%. Where those appeals come from, and how they fell, is below.
Planning Inspector · PINS28 appeals21% allowed9 boroughs
Where appeals come from — by borough · tap to focus
FewerMore appeals
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →28
Appeals decided
6 allowed · 22 dismissed
—
Avg inquiry
awaits decision-notice ingestion
—
Costs awarded
not yet traced per inspector
Allowed rate over time — harsher or more lenient
Per-year allowed rates for this inspector aren't computed yet — the trend publishes when the dated PINS decision history is fully ingested. No trend is shown until it's real.
What they decide — by scheme type
The scheme-type mix hasn't been traced for this inspector yet — it publishes from the PINS development-type record where available.
Grounds that carry appeals — what this inspector upholds[1]
The policy grounds this inspector leans on most when deciding appeals — how often each appears, and how often an appeal citing it is allowed.
Policy grounds are coded from each decision letter — this table publishes when decision-notice ingestion lands. The raw policy references already sit on each appeal in the record below.
Backs the officer — case by case
Appeals where the committee refused against its own officer's recommendation — and whether this inspector then sided with the officer (allowing) or the committee (dismissing).
Matching this inspector's appeals to committee-vs-officer decisions isn't traced yet — it publishes with decision-notice ingestion. The London-wide pattern is already live in Committee Watch.
Appeals by borough
Borough
Appeals
Allowed rate
Show all 9 rows
Where this inspector's appeals come from.[1] Click the map above to explore spatially, or a row to open the borough's appeals.
Costs awarded — by council
Costs decisions aren't yet traced to individual inspectors — the council-by-council costs table publishes when the PINS costs letters are ingested against this inspector's cases.
Recent appeals
Appeal ref
Borough
Outcome
Policies cited
Decided
3266368
Ealing
Dismissed
A5270, UB1, D6, D3
2026-03-29
3270992
Ealing
Dismissed
A5270, W7, T4
2026-03-29
3274277
Ealing
Dismissed
A5270, UB5
2026-03-29
3271803
Hillingdon
Dismissed
R5510, UB10, BE1, DMHD1
2026-03-29
3266368
Ealing
Dismissed
A5270, UB1, D6, D3
2026-03-29
3270992
Ealing
Dismissed
A5270, W7, T4
2026-03-29
3274277
Ealing
Dismissed
A5270, UB5
2026-03-29
Show all 4 rows
3271803
Hillingdon
Dismissed
R5510, UB10, BE1, DMHD1
2026-03-29
Full appeal history locked
Subscribe to see all 28 appeals →Agents at appeal
Which agents bring the most appeals before this inspector — and how often they win — publishes when the appeal case files are joined to the agent record. Pairing patterns, not endorsements.
At a glance
InspectorJonathan Edwards
BodyPINS
Appeals decided28
Allowed rate21%
London allowed avg26%
Boroughs9
Who decides here
Related investigations
Committee Watch — when members override their officers →
Where elected members override their planning officers — and how often the override is later overturned at appeal.
Refusal Hotspots — where it's hard →
The wards and boroughs where applications die — and the ones that wave almost everything through.
Sources & method
- [1]Appeals decided, allowed rate and the borough breakdown — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) published appeal decisions by this inspector across London. · PINS appeals casework
- [2]London-wide allowed-rate baseline — the same PINS appeal record aggregated across all 33 boroughs. · the Inspectorate — London
- [3]Scheme-type mix — PINS development-type classification of this inspector’s England-wide casework, where traced. · methodology
“Allowed” = the appeal succeeded, overruling the council. Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.