Development Intent
Case officer · Kensington And Chelsea Planning

Daniel Ambrose.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Kensington And Chelsea with an approval rate of 84% across 55 decided planning applications, spanning 17 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer55 decisions84% approvalSave
Kensington And Chelsea · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
55
Applications
2026
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate84% · 68th of 89
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Daniel Ambrose's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Daniel Ambrose decided — 18 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

CD3Kensington And Chelsea plan
9 times cited
CD4Kensington And Chelsea plan
9 times cited
CD1Kensington And Chelsea plan
8 times cited
CD2Kensington And Chelsea plan
8 times cited
GB7Kensington And Chelsea plan
6 times cited
CD10Kensington And Chelsea plan
6 times cited
CD11Kensington And Chelsea plan
5 times cited
GB16Kensington And Chelsea plan
4 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2026.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
PP/26/02098
Planning Permission
Approved
2026-05-27
PP/26/01911
Planning Permission
Approved
2026-05-22
PP/26/02098
Planning Permission
Approved
2026-05-27
PP/26/01911
Planning Permission
Approved
2026-05-22
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 55 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data

No named planning consultants on this officer's decided applications.

At a glance
OfficerDaniel Ambrose
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications55 (2026)
Approval rate84%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Kensington And Chelsea planning register and published decision notices, 2026. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Kensington And Chelsea decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.