Development Intent
AtlasLambethOfficersCamilla Bebb
Planning Atlas›Lambeth›Camilla Bebb
Case officer · Lambeth Planning

Camilla Bebb.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Lambeth with an approval rate of 79% across 840 decided planning applications, spanning 28 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer840 decisions79% approvalSave
Lambeth · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
840
Applications
2020–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%83%202085%202165%202277%202383%202483%202567%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate79% · 38th of 72
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Camilla Bebb's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Camilla Bebb decided — 656 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

Q11Building alterations and extensionsLambeth plan
454 times cited
Q5Local distinctivenessLambeth plan
430 times cited
Q2AmenityLambeth plan
381 times cited
Q8Design quality: construction detailingLambeth plan
213 times cited
Q22Conservation areasLambeth plan
172 times cited
Q20Statutory listed buildingsLambeth plan
87 times cited
T1Sustainable travelLambeth plan
71 times cited
T3CyclingLambeth plan
57 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
86
79%
83
80%
67
88%
66
82%
60
81%
57
98%
57
72%
55
76%
45
70%
44
60%
41
92%
38
67%
35
88%
24
82%
24
55%
10
78%
7
43%
6
67%
6
83%
5
100%
5
80%
4
75%
4
100%
4
0%
2
100%
2
100%
2
50%
1
–
86
79%
83
80%
67
88%
Show all 28 rows
66
82%
60
81%
57
98%
57
72%
55
76%
45
70%
44
60%
41
92%
38
67%
35
88%
24
82%
24
55%
10
78%
7
43%
6
67%
6
83%
5
100%
5
80%
4
75%
4
100%
4
0%
2
100%
2
100%
2
50%
1
–

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
25/02753/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2026-05-28
26/00937/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2026-05-27
25/02753/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2026-05-28
26/00937/FUL
Full Planning Permission
Refused
2026-05-27
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 840 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Resi
2. Faithorn Farrell Timms LLP
3. Turley
4. Design Team
At a glance
OfficerCamilla Bebb
BoroughLambeth
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications840 (2020–26)
Approval rate79%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Lambeth planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Lambeth decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.