Development Intent
AtlasLewishamOfficersJonathan Bainbridge
Case officer · Lewisham Planning

Jonathan Bainbridge.

Last recorded decision Nov 2021 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Lewisham with an approval rate of 67% across 12 decided planning applications, spanning 6 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer12 decisions67% approvalSave
Lewisham · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
12
Applications
2021
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average

Not enough dated decisions for a trend yet.

What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate67% · 45th of 52
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Jonathan Bainbridge's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Jonathan Bainbridge decided — 9 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
5 times cited
130NPPF
2 times cited
134NPPF
2 times cited
126NPPF
1 times cited
131NPPF
1 times cited
D5London Plan
1 times cited
19Lewisham plan
1 times cited
30SPD / guidance
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
2
100%
Show all 6 rows

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2021.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
DC/21/124093
Householder Application
Refused
2021-12-10
DC/21/123925
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2021-12-09
DC/21/124093
Householder Application
Refused
2021-12-10
DC/21/123925
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2021-12-09
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 12 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. TPP LTD
2. RUSSIAN FOR FISH
3. WYDesign Ltd.
4. Extension Architecture
At a glance
OfficerJonathan Bainbridge
BoroughLewisham
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications12 (2021)
Approval rate67%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Lewisham planning register and published decision notices, 2021. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Lewisham decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.