Development Intent
AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesCouncillorsAnton_mcnulty_howard
Planning AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesAnton McNulty-Howard
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Planning committee member · "/>, Richmond Upon Thames

Anton McNulty-Howard.

A Liberal Democrat member representing "/> in Richmond Upon Thames. Sits on the planning committee, with 10 recorded interventions. 0% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside "/> itself.

Liberal Democrat"/> wardPlanning committee
Richmond Upon Thames · Anton McNulty-Howard's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
10
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
0%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
How they intervene — by type
Ward objection
4
Declared interest
1
Ward support
1

How Anton McNulty-Howard acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Anton McNulty-Howard moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2023-05-10
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2023-05-10
Ward support
Planning Committee
2023-07-19
Planning Committee
2023-05-10
Planning Committee
2024-01-31
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2023-05-10
Ward objection
Planning Committee
2023-05-10
Ward support
Planning Committee
2023-07-19
Show all 5 rows
Planning Committee
2023-05-10
Planning Committee
2024-01-31
At a glance
PartyLiberal Democrat
Ward"/>
Planning committeeMember
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Richmond Upon Thames planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 10 of their 10 interventions (100%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.