Development Intent
AtlasRichmond Upon ThamesOfficersKerry Turner
Planning Atlas›Richmond Upon Thames›Kerry Turner
Case officer · Richmond Upon Thames Planning

Kerry Turner.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Richmond Upon Thames with an approval rate of 76% across 1,136 decided planning applications, spanning 16 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer1,136 decisions76% approvalSave
Richmond Upon Thames · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
1,136
Applications
2020–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%82%202069%202170%202276%202381%202479%202589%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate76% · 50th of 67
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Kerry Turner's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Kerry Turner decided — 104 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

D12London Plan
45 times cited
SI13London Plan
7 times cited
LP11Richmond Upon Thames plan
4 times cited
LP21Richmond Upon Thames plan
4 times cited
SI5London Plan
4 times cited
LP22Richmond Upon Thames plan
3 times cited
LP8Richmond Upon Thames plan
3 times cited
NPPFNPPF
2 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
165
76%
90
76%
83
72%
81
79%
70
78%
67
74%
63
77%
63
68%
61
80%
60
73%
60
85%
56
76%
48
79%
33
75%
1
100%
1
100%
165
76%
90
76%
83
72%
Show all 16 rows
81
79%
70
78%
67
74%
63
77%
63
68%
61
80%
60
73%
60
85%
56
76%
48
79%
33
75%
1
100%
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
PA26/1852
Listed Building Consent
—
2026-05-28
PA26/0824
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2026-05-19
PA26/1852
Listed Building Consent
—
2026-05-28
PA26/0824
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2026-05-19
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 1,136 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Chestnut Planning
2. HB Planning Services
3. B3 CC Limited
4. Planning Potential Ltd.
At a glance
OfficerKerry Turner
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications1,136 (2020–26)
Approval rate76%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Richmond Upon Thames planning register and published decision notices, 2020–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — Richmond Upon Thames's decision-notice parsing is limited coverage, so no borough or officer figure is shown.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.