Development Intent
AtlasSouthwarkCouncillorsJoseph_vambe
Planning AtlasSouthwarkJoseph Vambe
PolicyPoliticalCommitteeOfficersAgents & developersViabilityMapAppeals
Planning committee member · Chaucer, Southwark

Joseph Vambe.

A Labour member representing Chaucer in Southwark. Sits on the planning committee, with 15 recorded interventions. 7% of the interventions we could place on the map fall inside Chaucer itself.

LabourChaucer wardPlanning committee
Southwark · Joseph Vambe's interventions
Decisions — geocoded
ApprovedRefusedOther
⚠ Ward/map data below is built on councillor intervention records not yet through the doc-parser verification pass — treat as provisional.
⚠ “Committee sided/against” below is unverified — pending re-extraction of the officer-recommendation field.
At a glance · committee recordAll investigations →
15
Interventions
at committee
Meetings
attended
7%
In own ward
of resolved interventions
How they intervene — by type
Ward support
3

How Joseph Vambe acts at committee, by type of intervention.

Intervention history

Where Joseph Vambe moved, seconded, objected to, supported or voted on applications at committee, from the published minutes.

Intervention
Application
Committee
Date
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2025-01-22
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2025-01-22
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2023-09-11
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2025-01-22
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2025-01-22
Ward support
Planning Committee (Smaller Applications)
2023-09-11
At a glance
PartyLabour
WardChaucer
Planning committeeMember
CouncilSouthwark
Committee appearances, interventions and votes from Southwark planning-committee minutes. “Committee sided” = voted in line with the officer recommendation. Councillor records are matched from the minutes across inconsistent name forms and are still being completed. The map above plots 14 of their 15 interventions (93%) that we could match to a specific application in our own scraped records — the rest reference applications outside that coverage (older cases, or a different borough's register) and aren't placeable yet. See political control and the committee.