Development Intent
AtlasTower HamletsOfficersRosie Clements
Case officer · Tower Hamlets Planning

Rosie Clements.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Tower Hamlets with an approval rate of 83% across 241 decided planning applications, spanning 13 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer241 decisions83% approvalSave
Tower Hamlets · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
241
Applications
2023–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%85%202478%202589%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate83% · 34th of 76
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Rosie Clements's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Rosie Clements decided — 16 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

D3London Plan
7 times cited
D4London Plan
7 times cited
S.DH3Heritage and the historic environmentTower Hamlets plan
5 times cited
HC1London Plan
5 times cited
DH1SPD / guidance
3 times cited
D.DH2Attractive streets, spaces and public realmTower Hamlets plan
3 times cited
NPPFNPPF
1 times cited
D.DH10Advertisements, hoardings and signageTower Hamlets plan
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2023–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
PA/26/00617/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2026-05-28
PA/26/00618/NC
Listed Building Consent (S8 P&LBC 1990)
Approved
2026-05-28
PA/26/00617/NC
Full Planning Permission
Approved
2026-05-28
PA/26/00618/NC
Listed Building Consent (S8 P&LBC 1990)
Approved
2026-05-28
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 241 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Archway Building Consultancy Ltd
2. Potter Raper Ltd
3. Fallon Architects
4. Constructive Thinking Studio Ltd
At a glance
OfficerRosie Clements
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications241 (2023–26)
Approval rate83%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Tower Hamlets planning register and published decision notices, 2023–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Tower Hamlets decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.