Development Intent
AtlasWandsworthOfficersAidan Wackrow
Case officer · Wandsworth Planning

Aidan Wackrow.

Active — last recorded decision Jan 2026

A case officer at Wandsworth with an approval rate of 90% across 463 decided planning applications, spanning 10 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer463 decisions90% approvalSave
Wandsworth · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
463
Applications
2023–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%95%202391%202485%2025100%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate90% · 52nd of 68
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Aidan Wackrow's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Aidan Wackrow decided — 396 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
350 times cited
LP1The Design-led ApproachWandsworth plan
323 times cited
LP2General Development PrinciplesWandsworth plan
298 times cited
LP3Historic EnvironmentWandsworth plan
133 times cited
LP27Housing StandardsWandsworth plan
35 times cited
12NPPF
24 times cited
LP5Wandsworth plan
19 times cited
LP14Air Quality, Pollution and Managing Impacts of DevelopmentWandsworth plan
17 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2023–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
2026/0248
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2026-01
2026/0079
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2026-01
2026/0248
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2026-01
2026/0079
Application for Full Permission
Approved
2026-01
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 463 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Pddesign Consulting Limited
2. Studio 136 Architects Ltd
3. The Art of Building Ltd
4. MOMO & CO. Design Ltd.
At a glance
OfficerAidan Wackrow
BoroughWandsworth
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications463 (2023–26)
Approval rate90%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Wandsworth planning register and published decision notices, 2023–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Wandsworth decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.