Development Intent
AtlasWandsworthOfficersNeil Shaw
Case officer · Wandsworth Planning

Neil Shaw.

Recently active — last recorded decision Sep 2025

A case officer at Wandsworth with an approval rate of 63% across 28 decided planning applications, spanning 12 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer28 decisions63% approvalSave
Wandsworth · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
28
Applications
2020–25
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%0%202050%20220%202382%2024100%2025
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate63% · 68th of 68
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Neil Shaw's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Neil Shaw decided — 19 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
13 times cited
LP1The Design-led ApproachWandsworth plan
7 times cited
LP3Historic EnvironmentWandsworth plan
5 times cited
LP5Wandsworth plan
5 times cited
LP2General Development PrinciplesWandsworth plan
5 times cited
IS3SPD / guidance
2 times cited
DMS1SPD / guidance
2 times cited
1Wandsworth plan
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–25.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
2025/1750
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2025-05
2025/1233
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2025-04
2025/1750
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2025-05
2025/1233
Details (following full perm.)
Approved
2025-04
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 28 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. City Planning
2. Boyer Planning
3. Content Design Limited
4. Shape Urban Planning Consultants
At a glance
OfficerNeil Shaw
BoroughWandsworth
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications28 (2020–25)
Approval rate63%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Wandsworth planning register and published decision notices, 2020–25. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Wandsworth decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.