Development Intent
AtlasWandsworthOfficersRamasankaran Rajendran
Case officer · Wandsworth Planning

Ramasankaran Rajendran.

Active — last recorded decision May 2026

A case officer at Wandsworth with an approval rate of 88% across 340 decided planning applications, spanning 21 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer340 decisions88% approvalSave
Wandsworth · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
340
Applications
2023–26
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%95%202392%202483%202586%2026
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate88% · 63rd of 68
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Ramasankaran Rajendran's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Ramasankaran Rajendran decided — 310 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

NPPFNPPF
258 times cited
LP1The Design-led ApproachWandsworth plan
215 times cited
LP2General Development PrinciplesWandsworth plan
198 times cited
LP3Historic EnvironmentWandsworth plan
76 times cited
DMS1SPD / guidance
35 times cited
12NPPF
24 times cited
LP27Housing StandardsWandsworth plan
24 times cited
LP5Wandsworth plan
18 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2023–26.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
2026/1860
Details (following full perm.)
2026-05
2026/1673
Details (following full perm.)
2026-05
2026/1860
Details (following full perm.)
2026-05
2026/1673
Details (following full perm.)
2026-05
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 340 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Studio Werc Ltd
2. Resi Design Ltd
3. Martin Arnold Ltd
4. Pddesign Consulting Limited
At a glance
OfficerRamasankaran Rajendran
BoroughWandsworth
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications340 (2023–26)
Approval rate88%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Wandsworth planning register and published decision notices, 2023–26. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Wandsworth decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.