Development Intent
AtlasGreenwichOfficersJoanna Morgan
Case officer · Greenwich Planning

Joanna Morgan.

Last recorded decision Oct 2023 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Greenwich with an approval rate of 93% across 94 decided planning applications, spanning 17 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer94 decisions93% approvalSave
Greenwich · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
94
Applications
2020–23
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%100%202095%202195%202288%2023
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compareVersus peers
Approval rate93% · 11th of 57
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Joanna Morgan's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Joanna Morgan decided — 11 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

7.8Superseded
7 times cited
DH(I)Greenwich plan
6 times cited
DH1DesignGreenwich plan
5 times cited
DH3Heritage AssetsGreenwich plan
5 times cited
7.4Superseded
2 times cited
7.6Superseded
1 times cited
16NPPF
1 times cited
NPPFNPPF
1 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–23.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
21/3975/L
Listed Building Consent
No determination
2024-11-07
23/3254/L
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2023-12-18
21/3975/L
Listed Building Consent
No determination
2024-11-07
23/3254/L
Listed Building Consent
Approved
2023-12-18
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 94 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. E2 Architecture + Interiors
2. Russell Associates Architect
3. Rendall and Rittner Limited
4. dylan haughton architecture and construction
At a glance
OfficerJoanna Morgan
BoroughGreenwich
RolePlanning officer
Experience
Applications94 (2020–23)
Approval rate93%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Greenwich planning register and published decision notices, 2020–23. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Greenwich decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.