Development Intent
AtlasHillingdonOfficersNesha Burnham
Planning Atlas›Hillingdon›Nesha Burnham
Case officer · Hillingdon Planning

Nesha Burnham.

Last recorded decision Oct 2023 — no decisions in this record since

A case officer at Hillingdon with an approval rate of 68% across 644 decided planning applications, spanning 39 wards.[1] Decision speed and appeal performance publish when decision notices are ingested.

Planning officer644 decisions68% approvalSave
Hillingdon · ward map
Approval rate — by ward
Lower ~68%
Higher ~90%
ShowingAll years · subscriber →across all years on record — a period re-scopes the headline figures and the trend
At a glanceEach metric links to the investigation behind it
All investigations →
644
Applications
2020–23
Approval rate over time — tougher or softer 🔒Dashed line = London average
avg 81%73%202070%202160%202266%2023100%2024
Approval-rate trend is subscriber dataSubscribe to see the trend →
What they decide — by application type
How they compare — Versus peers
Approval rate68% · 53rd of 59
higher is betterdashed = London avg
Decision time— · publishes with decision notices
in development
Appeal overturn— · publishes with decision notices
in development
How this officer decides — from their own reports

Not filled in yet — this needs at least 20 of Nesha Burnham's own officer reports parsed, and their reports haven't reached that threshold in the parsing run. It fills automatically as parsing progresses; nothing is estimated in its place.

Policy playbook — what this officer cites[3]

The policies cited most on decision notices for applications Nesha Burnham decided — 203 parsed notices. From the published notices themselves; their own report wording is parsed separately.

DMHB11Design of New DevelopmentHillingdon plan
47 times cited
DMT6Vehicle ParkingHillingdon plan
24 times cited
DMT2Highways ImpactsHillingdon plan
24 times cited
DMHB14Trees and LandscapingHillingdon plan
24 times cited
DMHB12Streets and Public Realm sets out how we canHillingdon plan
23 times cited
D5London Plan
23 times cited
DMEI9Management of Flood RiskHillingdon plan
21 times cited
T6London Plan
21 times cited
Which policies this officer leans on is subscriber intelligenceSubscribe to unlock →
Decisions by ward
Ward
Decisions
Approval rate
51
75%
43
68%
36
81%
36
61%
31
63%
30
69%
29
71%
28
56%
28
74%
26
62%
22
41%
22
76%
21
68%
20
79%
20
72%
20
67%
18
61%
16
63%
15
71%
15
80%
15
67%
15
67%
14
38%
13
82%
12
78%
10
67%
9
50%
8
57%
6
60%
4
100%
2
100%
2
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
0%
1
100%
1
100%
1
0%
1
100%
51
75%
43
68%
36
81%
Show all 39 rows
36
61%
31
63%
30
69%
29
71%
28
56%
28
74%
26
62%
22
41%
22
76%
21
68%
20
79%
20
72%
20
67%
18
61%
16
63%
15
71%
15
80%
15
67%
15
67%
14
38%
13
82%
12
78%
10
67%
9
50%
8
57%
6
60%
4
100%
2
100%
2
100%
1
100%
1
100%
1
0%
1
100%
1
100%
1
0%
1
100%

Where this officer's caseload concentrates, 2020–23.[1] Click the map above to focus this page on a ward, or a row to open the ward.

Recent applications
Address
Reference
Type
Outcome
Date
5564/APP/2022/2356
Planning Application
Approved
2024-05-21
77460/APP/2022/2480
Planning Application
No determination
2024-02-07
5564/APP/2022/2356
Planning Application
Approved
2024-05-21
77460/APP/2022/2480
Planning Application
No determination
2024-02-07
Full application history locked
Subscribe to see all 644 decisions →
Consultants approved most— subscriber data
1. Mr Tyrrell Moor House Farm Estate Lower Road Higher Denham Uxbridge UB9
2. Mrs Sevda Kucuk AVA Home Design Ltd The Charter Building Uxbridge UB8
3. Mr Sunny Bahia ASB Architecture Ltd
4. Mr Richard West Cerda Planning Ltd. Vesey House,
At a glance
OfficerNesha Burnham
BoroughHillingdon
RolePlanning officer
Experience—
Applications644 (2020–23)
Approval rate68%
London approval avg81%
Who decides here
GovernmentMayor of LondonCouncilCommitteeOfficersDecisionsApplicantsInspectorate
Related investigations
When committees overrule officers like this one →
How often members depart from officer recommendations, and how those overrides fare at appeal.
How much gets decided without a committee →
The delegated share by borough and officer — where the real power over decisions sits.
Sources & method
  1. [1]Applications decided, approval rate, per-year trend and ward breakdown — London Borough of Hillingdon planning register and published decision notices, 2020–23. · methodology
  2. [2]Appeal overturn and decision-time benchmarks — Planning Inspectorate (PINS) appeal decisions and application date pairs; not yet computed per officer, shown as a dash until they are. · PINS appeals casework
  3. [3]Condition load — mean effective conditions attached to Hillingdon decision notices (grant/split), parsed from the published notice text; a borough figure, not yet split per case officer.
  4. [4]Policy citations will be coded from officer reports against the adopted Local Plan, London Plan and NPPF — that parsing has not run for this borough yet.
Methodology is published in full so every number is traceable to its primary source.